Intelligent Design against Evolution

DEFINITIONS.

CREATIONISM: Religious position that supposes the existence per itself of an Intelligent Designer: GOD, creator of the Universe in 6 days, 6000 years ago. It is supported by Saint Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologica. 1981. Amazon Books.USA), Spinoza and others. INTELLIGENT DESIGN (I.D.) It is supported by the Discovery Institute of Seattle.USA.(1990). They assume the existence per itself of an Intelligent Designer (GOD, extraterrestrial or, another). Supported by Michael J.Behe (Darwin' s Black Box. The Biochemistry Challenge to Evolution.1998.Free Press. USA), William Dembski (The Intelligent Design. 1998. Intervarsity Press. USA, Canada, Mexico) and others.
EVOLUTION: Supposes the creation of organic life at chance and the successive estructuration of intelligent organic human beeings, from a common ancestor (ancient cell). Until now it fill all the requirements that a consistent scientific need: structured, parsimonious, viable, experimentable, validated by multiples observations, subject to correction, dinamic, provisional, progressive and useful. It is supported by Charles Darwin. The Origin of species. 1995 (1859) Amazon Books.USA.

2 months ago, in Topeka (Kansas.USA), a series of audiences carried out by speechs of 24 notable witnesses (scientific and religious men), promoted by the Committee of Education of the State, established that, in reason of the existence of extremely complex cell mechanisms -suppossedly made by a Designer- there would be arguments to consider the Darwinian Evolution not as an unappealable dogma, but like a theory holds to thought and critic. Also the supporters of D.I., not accept a common vital ancestor or that the emergency of life was an accidental fact. These are the foundations of I.D. made by members of Discovery Institute of Seattle.

Adopting agnostic positions the I.D. has been introduced in Topeka public Biology´s classrooms, fact favored by his taking of distance from the Creationism (world was created : 6000 years ago). But it is a evanescent triumph because it will be submitted to reevaluations. In fact in the previous recent weeks the Judge of Pennsylvania: John Jones, judged against teaching of I.D in the public school of Dover.Pa. to consider it a pseudocientific theory similar to the Creationism bases and of any Religion. The Judge Jones (to See: the Decision Kitzmiller), funded his judgment in the clear separation of religion and science established in the American Constitucion. His allegations based in 139 articles refused : a) the existence of gaps in the theory of Evolution b) the introduction in Dover of a book that defends the I.D. c) the existence of numerous failures in the Evolution d) the idea that Evolution is only a theory.

Diseño Inteligente vs Evolucionismo

DEFINICIONES. Creacionismo : Postura religiosa que supone la existencia per se de un Diseñador Inteligente : Dios, creador del Universo en 6 dias, hace 6000 años. Propugnada por Santo Tomas de Aquino (Summa Theologica. 1981. Amazon Books.USA), Spinoza y otros.
Diseño Inteligente. Propugnada por el Instituto Discovery de Seattle.USA.(1990).Supone la existencia per se de un Diseñador Inteligente (Dios, extraterrestre u, otro).Porpugnada por Michael J.Behe (Darwin's Black Box.The Biochemistry Clallenge to Evolution.1998.Free Press), William Dembski (The Intelligent Design.1998. Intervarsity Press.USA,Canada,Mexico) y otros.
Evolucionismo: Supone la creacion de vida organica al azar y la sucesiva estructuracion de seres organicos inteligentes, a partir de un ancestro comun (celula primitiva). De momento llena los requisitos de toda teoria cientifica consistente : estructurada, parsimoniosa, viable, experimentable, validada por observaciones multiples, corregible, dinamica,.provisional, progresiva y util. Sustentada por Charles Darwin. The Origin of species.1995 (1859) Amazon Books.USA.

Hace 2 meses, en Topeka (Kansas.USA), una serie de audiencias llevadas a cabo via exposiciones de 24 testigos notables (cientificos y religiosos), promovidas por el Comité de Educación del Estado, establecieron que, en razon de la existencia de mecanismos celulares extremadamente complejos -dignos de un Diseñador- existian argumentos para considerar a la evolucion darwiniana no como un dogma inapelable, sino como una teoria mas sujeta a pensamiento critico. Es critico tambien para el Diseño Inteligente (D.I.), no aceptar un antepasado vital comun o, que la emergencia de la vida fué un hecho accidental. Estos son los fundamentos del D.I, un movimiento impulsado por el Instituto Discovery de Seattle. Al considerar a la evolucion una teoria abierta al escrutinio y adoptar posturas agnosticas, el D.I., logro en Topeka introducirse en las clases de Biología, de las escuelas publicas de Kansas, hecho favorecido por su aparente toma de distancia del Creacionismo (que estipula que el mundo se creó hace 6000 años).
Triunfo pirrico y sujeto a reevaluaciones porque en las semanas anteriores el Juez de Pennsylvania : John E.Jones, falló en contra de la enseñanza en las escuelas publicas del D. I., por considerar a esta como una teoria pseudocientifica, no desligada del todo del Creacionismo y la Religion. El Juez Jones (Ver :Decision Kitzmiller), juzgó que la Constitucion americana apoya la separacion de ciencia y religion. Su fallo estipulado en 139 articulos rechazó a) la existencia de brechas en la teoria de la Evolucion b) critico la introducción de un libro que hace apología del D.I. y c) no estuvo de acuerdo con que la evolucion adoleciera de numerosas fallas d) que sea solo una teoria.Leer mas:

1-http://www2.ncseweb.org/wp/?p=98

2-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Design