QUANTUM COMPUTER
A BREAKTHROUGH IS COMING
"Quantum computers can keep up with the
(true), complexity of nature." “Accurate modeling, has applications for
engineering, medicine, energy production and much more”: Richard Feynman
Although a quantum computer (QC), prototype
already works and is marketed (D-Wave S.),
installed in modules of 5 x 5m and heights of 7m., insulated with fiberglass
from the environment, with 50 qbits inserted in silica receivers,
protected by a near zero absolute cooling, with softwares adapted to electrons,
with environmental insulation, to avoid interference and errors. What is
missing ... What is left over? There is an excess of optimism, such as that
of Geordie Rose, co-founder of D-Wave System, who has made some predictions: One)
2020, using a QC, the NASA will identify 40 light years from Earth, a planet
with atmosphere and oceans of liquid water, similar to the Earth. Two)
2023, Experiments with QCs, will demonstrate the existence of parallel
universes. Three) 2028: QCs will play a critical role in creating
robots, which will match everything a human does. On the other hand, Google,
Intel and IBM, also have prototypes of QCs, not commercialized of 45 qbits,
although they hope to escalate the
number of their qbits to 1000 or more, in order to be able to predict
climatic changes, perform data encryption (100%, safe), develop new materials,
etc. What is missing? 1) Avoid decoherence (qbits
collapse), induced by noise, temperature changes, vibrations. Given this
fragility, the qbits, require temperatures close to absolute zero (-273 oC
Celsius), to remain stable. 2) New software and interconnect
technologies are needed to take advantage of the gigantic processing power of QCs.
As it is known while in classical computers (CC), a bit (transistor),
supposes 2 separate states (0 and 1), in a
QC, a qbit is 0 and 1 at the same time (superposition), a
phenomenon that together with entanglement (combinations of qbits superpositions), allow a QC, to
calculate in hours the complex modeling of a molecule, which possibly would take years
to a CC. 300 combinations of exponential superposition of qbits would produce more overlapping
states than existing atoms in the visible universe. 3) There are 6 to 7
different types of qubits, although only 3 or 4 are used. To obtain a
superposition, 2 qubits are needed and for an entanglement more
than 3. Some qbits need superconductors (where electrons flow without
resistance), others: oscillating charges of ions kept fixed by lasers, also
silica qbits with a single electron, controlled by microwaves. 4)
Increase the number of qbits to 1 million. Continue working with QC
simulators. Increase the number of math
softwares. Improve the accuracy of qbits controller microwaves. 5)
Given the enormous amounts of money to be invested, it is important to have a
coordinated work strategy between universities, governments and industry. 6)
Promote the growth of artificial intelligence (AI), through the use of QCs. 7)
Establish the supremacy of QCs over the CCs, solving problems that the
latter cannot do. Establish new ways (faster, more efficient), to perform
certain calculations, in order to facilitate modeling of the brain, of complex
molecules, of factoring large numbers solving encryption problems, taking as an
example the Shor's algorithm (factorization of large numbers), of great
practical contributions. According to Scott Aronson (Texas University), QCs
must solve certain problems, better than CCs. It is important that QCs can solve
the random circuit sampling problem (take random efficient quantum
circuits and generate samples for external distribution), build quantum
circuits of at least a certain minimum size, with which CCs, do not count. 8)
Reduce the error, especially now that the number of gates and qbits must
be increased. The most crucial mistake is that which occurs every time a gate
is used. Try that error for gates of qbits, be around: 0.1%. 9) How
much is missing to have a universal quantum computer? Google that favor the
supremacy of QCs, hopes to present one of them, at the end of 2019. Without
ruling on the date: IBM, IonQ, Rigetti and Harvard University, say it will be
very soon. Harvard University that uses
rubidium atoms and Microsof atoms that uses topological qbits, need more
time. Since silicon
qbits are fixed and need to be individually calibrated,they will have a difficult task at time of increasing the number of their qbits.
Trapped ions give more time to make sure of their collapse, due to
environmental noise. On the other hand, its gates are very slow allowing ions
to move, when they are not needed. Some think that qbits
should adopt 2 bit qualities of CCs: be easily scalable and impeccable. 10)
Anything else? According to Adam Bouland (California, University,
Berkeley), after QCs solve the problem of random circuit sampling, there
will be others, especially everyday tasks: financial services, AI, chemistry,
creation of QCs capable of
self-eliminating their errors in real time, so that at the end, they will offer calculations without errors, which will
require massive amounts of error-correcting qbits, connected to each
logic gate.
Labels: bit, classical computer, entanglement, qbit, quantum computer, superposition
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home