Google
Support independent publishing: buy this book on Lulu.

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Creation vs Evolution. Part II.


As all they know in Dover,Pa-USA (as before, in other cities of the world), has been given does few months a debate about if the Creationism must be or not, matter of obliged teaching in the secondary school. The debate finished this week, with the acceptance of the Creationism courses dictation. That well, as every community requires it, that itself prided to have freedom of speech and thought. Personally the theme aside from Byzantine discussion, seems to me absurd. In the meantime alone serves to face the same old extremists, without greater contribute by middle. The ideologies and world views are renewable theoretical constructions to as changes our mind agree with the ephocal and the new contribution of the knowledge. Not eternal world views exist. Perhaps we do not have just seen it fallen of the omnipotent one (in their time), communist ideology? Between Creationism and Evolucionism, the radicals cannot be the north. The theme here, should be tolerance and permanent discussion. Subsequently I will discuss 2 options, in favor of each position.

1) British scientifics has just shown that Pederpes finneyae (a marine/land, tortoise species that inhabit does 345 million years in Dumbarton, Scotland), had the feet but primitive that we have news. On the other hand, the argentinien paleontologist Zulma Gasparini, discovered (overall with other American investigators), in the argentinian Patagonian (1986), remainders fossils of a crocodile sui generis:Dakasaurus andiniensis, a very well preserved (4 meters of long, head of dinosaur (by its resemblance al of Tyrannosaurus Rex), body of crocodile: short snout, 100 sharp teeth and definite feet). Fact that adds confirmatory points to the evolutionist sequential hypothesis: fish, birds, mammals, upper primates, Homo sapiens sapiens. Which in the theme Evolucionism/ Creationism, something says although not a lot.

2) With the previous thing and many additional tests, the theme of the origin of the man from a common ancestor appears consolidated, not deserving greater discussions, it is a theme settled. But the figure to intend to impose this knowledge by force, seems to me absurd, it should be a theme of the curricula and, nothing but. However, its consolidation does not imply to rule out of the all to an intelligent designer. I'll explain this. If some great company, gave me the facilities to Create a Virtual Universe, I would not design, one with human beings as central axis of my creation. I will consider the human beeings well as an excrescence, a by-product of another of greater consistency. Besides this I would consider fool to create them to my image and resemblance, I would prefer variety. More coherent would be to leave traces of DNA in any planet, so that the evolution qualify them and improve, according to the circumstances. And, if had a lot of presion, I would concentrate exactly in the beginning, in the big bang knowingly that from quarks and germinal electrons, the organic life (without definite model in between), will emerge by if alone, in the optimum momentum. So what to lose time forming humans. That they emerge or not, in the planets to be constituted, will not be for me a serious problem that me to break the head. In the meantime as we know very little, should not exist vetoes to any kind of intellectual flight, so as to diminish the imagination. Proof that we know still very little, is the theme of the human creations in the science's fields. With the exception of math (that unfortunately, also have limits), most inventions and discoveries do not pass to be regular natural events acquaintances copies (plane/flight of birds, levers/flexion of arm on forearm, photographic camera/eye, radio and TV/copies of radiation waves, etc). Where is the creative, human process by excellence?. Does we have created special and different butterflies to the ones that we see? Suns?, insects?. About what are we speaking.? We are at the beginning of a technological civilization. We know very little. We must be humble, participatory and receptive to all schools of thought. The bad conceptions, will to be purified little by little: by natural evolution, not one must do question of state because of it.
Creacionismo vs Evolucionismo.
Como todos saben en Dover,Pa.-USA (al igual que antes, en otras ciudades del mundo), se ha dado hace pocos meses un debate acerca de si el Creacionismo debia ser o nó, materia de enseñanza obligada en la escuela secundaria. El debate terminó esta semana, con la aceptación del dictado de cursos de Creacionismo. Que bien, como lo exige toda sociedad, que se precie de tener libertad de expresión y pensamiento. Personalmente el tema aparte de discusión bizantina, me parece absurda, en tanto solo sirve para enfrentar a los extremistas de siempre, sin mayor aporte de por medio. Las ideologías y cosmovisiones son construcciones teoricas renovables a como cambia nuestra mente concorde con la epoca y los nuevos aportes del conocimiento. No existen cosmovisiones eternas. ¿Acaso no acabamos de ver la caida de la todopoderosa (en su epoca), ideología comunista?. Entre Creacionismo y Evolucionismo, los radicales no pueden ser el norte. El tema aca, debe ser tolerancia y discusión permanente. A continuación problematizaré 2 opciones, una a favor de cada posición.

1) Cientificos inglese acaba de demostrar que Pederpes finneyae (una especie de tortuga marina/terraquea que habitó hace 345 millones de años en Dumbarton, Escocia), disponía de los pies mas primitivos de que se tenga noticia. De otro lado, la paleontologa argentina Zulma Gasparini, http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/11/science/11croc.html, descubrió (de conjunto con otros investigadores americanos), en la Patagonia argentina (1986), restos fosiles de un cocodrilo sui generis, :Dakasaurus andiniensis, muy bien preservado (4 metros de largo, cabeza de dinosaurio (por su semejanza al de Tyrannosaurus Rex), cuerpo de cocodrilo :hocico corto, 100 afilados dientes y pies definidos). Hecho que añade un punto confirmatorio a la hipótesis secuencial evolucionista : peces, aves, mamiferos, primates superiores,Homo sapiens sapiens. Lo cual en el tema Evolucionismo/Creacionismo, dice algo aunque no mucho.

2) Con lo anterior y muchas pruebas adicionales, el tema del origen del hombre a partir de un ancestro común se consolida, no ameritando mayores discusiones, es un tema saldado. Mas la figura de pretender imponer este conocimiento a la fuerza, me parece absurdo. Esto es un tema de la curricula y, nada más. Empero, la consolidación de la evolución del hombre a partir de un ancestro común, no implica descartar del todo a un diseñador inteligente. Me explico, si alguna gran compañía, me diese las facilidades para Crear un Universo Virtual, yo no esbozaria, uno con seres humanos como eje central de mi creación. Podrian considerarlos mas bien como una excrecencia derivada de otras, de mayor consistencia. Por lo demas, seria tonto crearlos a mi imagen y semejanza, preferiria la variedad. Seria mas coherente dejar rastros de DNA, para que la evolucion los cualifique y mejore, según las circunstancias. Y, si tuviera mucha presion, me concentraria en puntos iniciales, en el big bang a sabiendas que a partir de quarks y electrones germinales, la vida organica (sin patrón definido de por medio), emergeria por si sola, en el optimum momentum. Para que perder tiempo formando humanos. Que ellos emerjan o no, en los planetas a constituirse, no seria algo que me rompiera la cabeza. Desde un nivel más alto, el que el hombre emerja de un T.rex y no de un chimpancé, no haria la diferencia. En tanto sabemos muy poco, no deberian existir vetos a ningun tipo de vuelo intelectual, so pena de minar la imaginación. Prueba de que sabemos aún muy poco, es el tema de las creaciones humanas en el ámbito de la ciencia. Con la excepción de las matemáticas (que infelizmente, tambien tienen limites), la mayoria de inventos y descubrimientos no pasan de ser regulares copias de conocidos eventos naturales (avión/vuelo de aves, palancas/flexión de brazo sobre antebrazo, camara fotográfica/ojo humano, radio y TV/copia de radiaciones, etc). ¿Donde está el proceso humano, creativo por excelencia?, Hemos creado mariposas diferentes a las que vemos? Soles?¿insectos?.De que estamos hablando.? Estamos en los albores de una civilización tecnológica. Sabemos muy poco. Seamos humildes, participativos y receptivos a todas las corrientes de pensamiento. Las malas concepciones, serán depuradas poco a poco : por evolución natural, no hay que hacer cuestión de estado por ello. Leer mas:

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Technology Blog Blog Archive More on Yasukuni
Per a request in the comments of my previous post, let me post a few more of my notes about Yasukuni Shrine.
Hi, I was just blog surfing and found you! If you are interested, go see my food related site. It isnt anything special but you may still find something of interest. Come in and check it out if you get time :-.

10:49 AM  
Blogger jipzeecab said...

The conservative religious group that put "intelligent design" as a guise for creationism on the ballot in Dover, PA missed the boat a century ago and is desperately trying to appear relevant. The fact is that even among their own membership a majority believes the concept is nonsense...they just don't have the heart to tell their pastors this because they're too busy trying to save their souls because of their other transgressions against nature!

7:36 PM  
Blogger victormechanmendez said...

Dear jipzeecab:that's good information in relationship to this theme. But think this, we know very few.We are just at the beginnig of a technological civilization. Your friend vmm

11:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

www.evolucionhumana.netfirms.com

LA EVOLUCIÓN DEL HOMBRE(HUMANA)-THE HUMAN EVOLUTION-
ORIGENES DE LA VIDA-ORIGINS AND
CULTURE-PREHISTORIA-ANTROPOLOGIA-NATIONAL
GEOGRAPHIC,DISCOVER,CHARLES DARWIN.


La evolución Biologica,Fosiles Homínidos,Yacimiento
Atapuerca,Paleontología,Creacionismo y Evolucionismo,
Arqueología,Paleo-etnologia
homínida,Homnidos,Ýacimientos de la Sierra de
Atapuerca,Historia Natural,Dinosaurios,

Anthropology,Primitive art,Origins of Human,Natural
History,Physical,Excavations,Genesis of
Man,Austalopithecus,Cro-Magnon,Prehistory,Homo
sapiens,Human Antiquity,Human
origins,World,Neandertals,Sciencen
Education,PaleoAnthropology,Creation/Evolution,Discover,National
Geographic,Nature,Science,Friday,Ecology,Natural
History,Dinosaur,Charles dauwin.

7:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

best regards, nice info Grand thft auto plug ins Refinancing maryland Pellet dryer Marka kia Continental airlines check moscow Babes of britain cock monster Ice cream machine 20 czci samochodowe saab Home+owner+car+insurance Cialis ohne rezept Subaru dealers oregon Louisiana+uninsured+automobile+insurance Single trip travel insurance go travel insurance central Free medical office templates insurance verification form

7:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey,

When ever I surf on web I come to this website[url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/lose-10-pounds-in-2-weeks-quick-weight-loss-tips].[/url]Plenty of useful information on vmechanm.blogspot.com. I am sure due to busy scedules we really do not get time to care about our health. Are you really serious about your weight?. Research presents that nearly 60% of all USA adults are either chubby or weighty[url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/lose-10-pounds-in-2-weeks-quick-weight-loss-tips].[/url] Therefore if you're one of these citizens, you're not alone. Its true that we all can't be like Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Megan Fox, and have sexy and perfect six pack abs. Now next question is how you can achive quick weight loss? You can easily lose with with little effort. If you improve some of your daily diet habbits then, its like piece of cake to quickly lose weight.

About me: I am author of [url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/lose-10-pounds-in-2-weeks-quick-weight-loss-tips]Quick weight loss tips[/url]. I am also health trainer who can help you lose weight quickly. If you do not want to go under hard training program than you may also try [url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/acai-berry-for-quick-weight-loss]Acai Berry[/url] or [url=http://www.weightrapidloss.com/colon-cleanse-for-weight-loss]Colon Cleansing[/url] for fast weight loss.

5:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

top [url=http://www.001casino.com/]casino online[/url] coincide the latest [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com/]las vegas casino[/url] unshackled no consign reward at the best [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]bay attend casino
[/url].

7:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home