"What will lead us to
make great efforts to know our universe. Answer: Perhaps, with the growing
knowledge that we have today, in the future, an advanced human civilization will create
a new universe, either because we are fleeing from universal cataclysmic
events, either because we want better designs, or because we want to be
immortals. This saga was initiated by Lemaître and continued by Hawking and others......".
There are cosmology models, which
could explain the origin of our universe and of living beings.1) BIG BANG
THEORY. After solving the equations of Einstein, on the geometry of the
universe, the catholic physicist Georges Lemaître, postulated that our universe
was expanding; opinion backed by astronomers V.M. Slipher, C.W. Wirtz and E.
Hubble after observing a redshift of light from spiral nebulae. Thanks to this
finding, Lemaître, proposed in 1931 the hypothesis that the universe would have
originated in the explosion (Big Bang) of a primeval atom: a dense, hot point,
full of energy, continued by an expansion (cosmic inflation). An
objection to this theory was made by Alan Guth, in 1980, who said that
physicists would accept such a theory, if the expansion had been disordered,
chaotic, instead of smooth and orderly with possibilities of being flat because
of gravity. Additional objections: where did the energy come from to expand the
universe? What was there before the Big Bang? 2) THEORY OF NO BOUNDARY
PURPOSAL. In 1981, Stephen Hawking argued before the Pontifical Academy of
Sciences of the Vatican that the early universe originated in a space-time
without limits (no boundary proposal), blurry, with form of a cap-off, similar to the south pole
of the earth : a singularity without limits, without beginning or end,
starting from a scratch, where time did not exist, as it was potentially
contained in the singularity of the primal atom. Space and time would be
born after the Big Bang. According to this theory, the concept of a
principle of the universe has no meaning, because its origin was the emergence
of a singularity in the pre-Big Bang space. This state of
Hartle-Hawking, although without principle, is not necessarily a universe in a
stationary state. In 1983, James Hartle, conceived the universe like a badminton projectile (shuttlecock), with a bottom diameter
equal to 0, widening gently and gradually in the opposite part. This conical form,
explained in an equation (wave function of the universe), covered all the past and the future. According to Hawking, it
made no sense to ask what was there before the Big Bang, because there was no
notion of time to refer to. However, in 2014, Hartle (University of
California), reconceptualized time: every moment in the universe would be a
cross section of the conic area. Correlating the size of the universe in each
cross section with other properties (entropy, which increases from the
bottom to the feathers of the shuttlecock), would configure an emergent
arrow of time. Another objection to Hartle, was that at the bottom of the shuttlecock,the correlations of time are not so reliable, because this cease, being
replaced by pure space. At this point, Neil Turok (Perimeter Institute for
Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Canada), commented that these ideas
represented an initial quantum description of the cosmos. 2 years later, Turok
and collaborators said that they would accept the viability of a universe
without limits, only if it were curved outwards from a point without dimensions
growing in a similar way to the actual universe. Hawking and Hartle argued that
unlimited universes tend to be huge, smooth, flat and expansive. Turok and
others, refuted Hartle and Hawking's with new math techniques that improved the
predictions. In 1915, Einstein said that the concentrations of matter and
energy distort the matter and energy of space and in 1960, Hawking and Penrose
proved that when the space-time is bent
intensely, as happens inside a black hole or a Big Bang, these
collapse infinitely curving towards a singularity, so, Einstein's
equations stop working, being needed a new quantum theory of gravity.After being calculated the integral path of these
collisions was possible to obtain the
wave function (probabilistic distribution of universe emergencies or possible
states, after the collision of particles). Thanks to this, the wave function of
the universe was described as the sum of all possible paths that a smooth
expansion of a universe can take, starting from a point. it is the sum of many stories of
universes withdifferent sizes, shapes and dimensions, with a
high probability that one of them has a smooth, smooth, flat conformation. If
we did not find one such as ours, the wave function of the universe built for a
universe without limits would be an error. At present, physicists know 2 possible
dominant expansions of calculation, which the universe can have. After the
start of the expansion from a scratch, these universes expand according to
Einstein's theory of gravity and space-time. One of these 2 solutions resemble
our universe, being at large scales: soft and speckled randomly with energy,
due to quantum fluctuations during inflation. If this possible solution
dominates the wave function, in experiments performed in minispaces, it will
be possible to imagine that a more detailed and accurate version of the wave
function without limits could serve as a viable cosmological model of the real
universe. And, if the 2 dominant stories had locations on the map, this should
be resolved at some point, because the trend is that we should adopt is only one
way, rather than an integration of both. In this regard, in an article
published in 2017, Turok, Feldbrugge and Lehners adopted an expansive cosmic
path promoted by the second dominant solution, adopting real, rather than
imaginary values for physics, to make sense. In experiments performed in minispaces,
only the contours that capture a coherent history of expansion make sense. On
the other hand, quantum mechanics requires normalizable probabilities, in which
the highly fluctuable universe designed by Turok does not take place. In 1960
John Wheeler and Bryce DeWitt, argued that the wave function of the universe
could not depend on time, because there was no external clock, to measure it
and because the amount of energy in the universe tends to be zero forever.
Always innovative and shortly before dying Hawking already used holography, treating space-time as a hologram, in which the total geometry of the represented
past could predict the present. On the other hand, Turok, Latham Boyle and
Kieran Finn, developed a cosmological model without limits, that instead of
continuing with the badminton projectile (shuttlecock), charts the bottomsof 2 united universes : cork to cork, with time fluctuating in 2
directions, matter and antimatter, right and left, forward and backward in
time, with the objection that mirror
images of the universe, unite in a singularity that requires a depth understanding
of the unknown quantum theory of gravity. 3) THEORY OF THE CYCLIC UNIVERSE.
Sustained in 1980, by Vilekin and Linde, based on a theoretical rebirth of the tunnel
propossing, to understand how the universe would have been formed from
nothing. It conceives the birth of the universe as a tunnel-like quantum
mechanical event, similar to when a particle emerges beyond a barrier in a
quantum experiment, favoring empty universes, being large amounts of matter and
energy necessary to be viable. Its advantage is that the proposed tunnel favors
the emergence of multiple universes, full of energy and matter like ours.
When Georges Lemaitre observed 87 years ago,
the displacement of light from distant galaxies, he understood that the
universe was expanding, inducing him to postulate the theory of the cosmic egg (Big Bang), reinforced later
by additional arguments of Gamow, Hubble, Penzias, etc., who saidthat
some 13.8 billion years ago, the initial universe was a state of infinite
density (singularity) and the temperature was extremely high.Soon after, the space-time expanded
continuously, until today. When in September 2015, thanks to the Ligo
experiment, the first direct observation of gravitational waves was made, which
reinforced the concept of singularity, the Big Bang almost ceased to be a
theory, leaving only to be explained what there was before the occurrence of this
phenomenon. With what is currently known about black holes (the other
side of the Big Bang, according to
us), there are convergences between the Big Bang and black holes: both have singularities
from which do not escape the light, nor the time. Thus, when we ask what
happens with the singularity that results from the merger of multiple black
holes in our universe, one option, depending on the greater or lesser amount of
accumulated information, is that a gigantic black hole could originate a
similar or a different new universe and so on, cyclically. It is known that when two medium size black holes collide form one of larger size. A small black hole
could eventually originate a wormhole.
Although well-informed scientists (S.Hawking), argue that black holes lose information
because of inherently outward radiation,
Hawking himself seems to contradict himself when, together with Penrose, claimed that quantum processes within
singularities are incomplete and that they may need other types
of mathematical equations. If the possibility of forming new universes from
singularities formed in black holes would exist, the answer to an initial
question would be that time existed before the Big Bang, provided by the
preceding universe. In this regard, Tim Koslowski, Flavio Mercati and David (Physics Letters B), have reinterpreted
the model of physical changes in singularities, when considering separately the
properspace-time from the matter that it contains, replacing the
singularity with a Janus Point : relative scales of the material that makes up
the universe are crushed to set a 2D
plane, as time is rewound. After that, the 2D plane (Janus point) recovers its
3D, although in the opposite direction, reaching deep implications in the
symmetry of the physics of the possible particles, obtaining a universe based
essentially on antimatter.
ANTES DE LA SINGULARIDAD, EXISTIÓ EL TIEMPO
Cuando Georges Lemaitre observo hace
87 años, el desplazamiento de la luz procedente de galaxias distantes, comprendido
que
el universo se estaba expandiendo, induciéndolo a postular la teoría del huevo cósmico (Big Bang), reforzada más tarde por argumentos adicionales de Gamow, Hubble,
Penzias,etc., quienes aportarían que hace unos 13
800 millones de años, el universo inicial era un estado
de densidad infinita (singularidad) y temperatura extremadamente
altas,para poco después, expandirse en el tiempo-espacio en forma continua, hasta hoy. Cuando en septiembre del 2015, merced al experimento Ligo, se realizó la primera
observación directa de ondas
gravitacionales, que reforzaron elconcepto de singularidad, el Big
Bang casi dejo de ser una teoría, quedando solo por explicar que hubo antes
de la ocurrencia de este fenómeno. Con lo que se sabe actualmente de los
agujeros negros (la otra cara del Big Bang,
según nosotros), se observan convergencias entre el Big Bang y los agujeros
negros: ambos poseen en mayor o menor grado singularidades, de las que no
escapan la luz, ni el tiempo. Así, cuando nos preguntamos que pasara con la
singularidad que resulte de la fusión de múltiples agujeros negros en nuestro universo,
una opción, dependiendo de la mayor o menor cantidad de información acumulada,
es queun gigantesco agujero negro origine un
universo nuevo semejante o diferente al nuestro y así sucesiva y cíclicamente.
Es conocido que agujeros negros de tamaño mediano colisionan formando uno de
mayor tamaño. Un agujero pequeño podría originar
eventualmente, un agujero de gusano. Aunque
científicos bien informados (S.Hawking), arguyen que los agujeros negros
pierden información a causa de una radiación hacia afuera inherente a estos
monstruos, el mismo Hawking parece contradecirse cuando junto con Penrose, afirmaron que los procesos cuánticos al interior de las
singularidades al ser incompletas, podrían necesitar de otro tipo de ecuaciones
matemáticas. Si la posibilidad de formar nuevos universos a partir de
singularidades formadas en agujeros negros existiese, la respuesta a una
pregunta inicial sería que eltiempo existió antes del Big Bang, proveído
por el universo precedente.Al respecto,
Tim Koslowski, Flavio Mercati y David (Physics
Letters B), han reinterpretado el modelo de cambios físicos en
singularidades, al considerar de manera
separada al espacio-tiempo propiamente dicho, de la materia que contiene,
remplazando la singularidad por el Punto de Jano: las escalas relativas del material que constituye
el universo son aplastadas hasta
configurar un plano de 2D, a medida que serebobina el tiempo. Tras ello, el plano de 2D
(punto de Jano), recupera sus 3D, aunque en sentido inverso, alcanzándose profundas
implicaciones en la simetría de la física de las partículas posibles, obteniéndose
un universo basado esencialmente de antimateria.
Until recently it was thought that a black
hole would only reach gigantic dimensions if it were able to swallow many
galaxies and stars with enough mass in order to expand. Consequently, it is
difficult to suppose the existence of supermassive black holes in the childhood
(first 200-600 years), of our universe. However, reality is different from many theories. The
astronomer Eduardo Bañados (Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for
Science and the Department of Astrophysical Sciences of Princeton), with images
taken from the Las Campanas Observatory (La Serena/Chile), has discovered a
quasar (J1342 + 0928), an unmistakable mark of a supermassive black hole,
engulfing gas, barely 690 million years old, after the Big Bang (5% of the
current universe's age). A black hole with a mass of 8 × 108M⊙ (800 million times, the mass of the sun), in
a universe with a change to red z:
7.54, significantly neutral, in reionization time (xHI> 0.33 (xHI> 0.11).
Period, in which our universe barely came out of the dark phase and
contained vast clouds of fog. Some scientists believe that these supermassive
black holes were created by sudden growth (spur),
defying Eddington's law (self-limitation of hole growth) According to another
Chilean astronomer, Leopoldo Infante (Director of the Observatory: Las
Campanas), there must have been a very rapid process that gathered a lot of
mass in a special place in the universe, forming the quasar. Other scientists
believe that by simply engulfing the collapsed clouds of this early universe,
there would have been the growth of these supermassive black holes, in a time
full of chaotic skirmishes between protons and naked electrons forming neutral atoms of H, which absorbed bright UV
light from the first stars. And, although we know that the reionization was
completed 1 billion years after the Big Bang, the mass around this new quasar
is half neutral, half ionized. As if that were not enough, Bolaños believes
that there are other early supergiant black holes in the northern part of the
universe. In this regard, a geometry specialist could predict the pillared
areas (those that would support the greatest weight), during the accelerated
formation of domes, being able to infer from there, the special parts of a
universe in formation, that required more energy. Be that as it may, this
discovery reinforces the theory that the function of black holes is to swallow
redundant material to maintain a plan for the creation of the universe (fine tuning), even an order to create
organic life.
AGUJEROS NEGROS BEBES, SUPERMASIVOS
Hasta hace poco se pensaba que un agujero
negro solo alcanzaría dimensiones gigantescas si fuese capaz de engullir muchas
galaxias y estrellas con suficiente masa a fin de expandirse. En consecuencia, es difícil suponer
la existencia de agujeros negros supermasivos en la infancia (primeros 200-600
años), de nuestro universo. Como siempre, la realidad es distinta a muchas teorías.
El astrónomo Eduardo Bañados (Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science and the Department of
Astrophysical Sciences of Princeton),
con imágenes tomadas del Observatorio Las Campanas (La Serena/Chile), ha
descubierto un quásar (J1342+0928), marca inconfundible de un agujero negro supermasivo, engullendo gas, de apenas 690
millones de años, después del Big Bang (5% de la edad del universo
actual). Un agujero con una masa de 8 × 108M⊙ (800 millones de veces, la masa del
sol), en un universo con un cambio al rojo
z: 7.54, significativamente neutral, en época de reionizacion
(xHI > 0.33 (xHI > 0.11). Periodo, en la que nuestro universo
salía de la fase de oscuridad y contenía extensas nubes de niebla. Algunos científicos creen que estos agujeros negros supermasivos
se crearon por crecimiento súbito (spur),
desafiando la ley de Eddington (autolimitación del crecimiento del agujero). Según otro astrónomo chileno Leopoldo Infante
(director del Observatorio: Las Campanas), debió haber existido un proceso muy rápido
que reunió mucha masa en un lugar especial del universo, formando el quásar. Otros científicos opinan que con solo engullir las nubes colapsadas
de este universo temprano, se habría producido
el crecimiento de estos agujeros
negros bebes supermasivos, en una época plena de caóticas escaramuzas entre protones y electrones desnudos formando
átomos neutrales de H, que absorbieron luz UV brillante de las primeras estrellas. Y, aunque sabemos que la reionizacion se completó
1 billón de años después del Big Bing, la
masa alrededor de este nuevo quásar es mitad neutral, mitad ionizada.
Por si fuera poco, Bolaños
cree que existen otros agujeros supergigantes tempranos en la parte norte del
universo. Al respecto un especialista en geometría podría predecir las áreas
pilares (las que soportarían el mayor peso), durante la formación acelerada de
domos, pudiéndose inferir a partir de ahí, las partes especiales de un universo
en formación. Sea lo que sea, este descubrimiento, refuerza la teoría de que la
función de los agujeros negros es tragarse el material redundante para mantener
un plan de creación del universo (fine
tuning), incluso un orden para crear vida orgánica.
What does mean the discovery of huge circular space areas almost empty (hypodense) and very cold in the stellar space, like images recently identified
by the Hawaii's Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) telescope and the Nasa satellite's Wide Field
Survey Explorer (WISE), correlated with thermal data of the cosmic background
radiation obtained by the Planck satellite, while astronomers counted the number of galaxies present in the
constellation of Eridanus (southern galactic hemisphere : 1.8 billion light
years ?. According to István Szapudi (Institute for Astronomy at the University
of Hawaii at Manoa), the finding was theorized due to a missing of some 10,000
galaxies in an extremely cold area (Cold
Spot). I) For Roberto Trotta
(Imperial College London), the Cold Spot
or Cold Spots, due its existence to
the accelerated expansion of the universe which caused slowing of light photons
when these cross the cold empty. In accelerated expansions everything becomes
less dense as the expansion progresses. In these cases, the light entering
hypodense areas loses almost all its energy, getting larger wavelengths
corresponding to colder temperatures. II)
This finding almost confirms the existence of a void pre-existent to the big bang through which is currently
expanding our universe, suggesting in turn that our universe is limited. Being
the vacuum (continent), larger than our universe, there is a possibility that it
can contain other systems or parallel universes (contents), collapsing or
expanding.
SUPERVACIOS ESPACIALES
¿Qué significado tiene descubrir gigantescas
áreas espaciales circulares casi vacías (hipodensas), muy frías, del
espacio estelar, como las imágenes identificadas recientemente por el telescopio Hawaii’s
Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) y el satellite Nasa’s Wide Field Survey Explorer (WISE), correlacionadas
con los datos térmicos de la radiación cósmica
de fondo obtenidos por el satélite Planck,
mientras astrónomos contaban el numero de galaxias presentes en la constelación de Erídano (Hemisferio galáctico sur
: 1,8 billones de años luz?. Según István Szapudi (Institute for Astronomy at
the University of Hawaii at Manoa), el hallazgo fue teorizado ante el faltante de unas 10 000 galaxias en un área
extremadamente fría (Cold Spot). I) Para Roberto Trotta (Imperial College London), el Cold Spot o Cold Spots, deben su existencia a la expansión acelerada del universo
promotora del enlentecimiento de fotones de luz al cruzar fríos vacíos. En expansiones aceleradas todo se vuelve menos
denso a medida que avanza la expansión. En estos casos, la luz que ingresa a espacios
hipodensos pierde casi toda su energía quedando con longitudes de onda más grandes,
correspondientes a temperaturas mas frías. II) Tal hallazgo ratifica la existencia de un vació pre-existente al big bang por el que se expande actualmente
nuestro universo, sugerente a su vez de que nuestro universo es limitado. Siendo el vacío (continente), más extenso que nuestro universo, existe la posibilidad de que pueda
contener a otros sistemas o universos paralelos (contenidos), en colapso o,
en expansión.
An adequate comprehension of physic’s symmetry, is fundamental to understand the origin of the universe and our organic presence, constituted basically by protons and neutrons. Until 1956 it was accepted that physical’s laws had 3 independent simmetries: C, P and T (Symmetry C = physical’s laws, equal for particles and antiparticles. Sim.P = physical’s laws, equal for any situation and its mirror image. Sim. T = if the direccion of the movement of particles and antiparticles (time for example), is inverted the system is again equal). Today are not accepted independent symmetries but the combined action of the 3: CPT, existing a theorem according to which the universe would have to be behaved equal if were replaced its particles by antiparticles, its image was like the seen in a mirror and be inverted the direction of the time: J.W. Croninand Val Fitch, Tsung-Dao Leeand Chen Ning Yan). Few nanoseconds after the Big Bang existed supposedly equal quantities of quarks and antiquarks. Then, our presence here is alone understood in the supposedly fact that for some reason were an excess quarks over antiquarks, constituting the organic matter of what we are done
To the achievement of a better comprehension of the previous thing helped the recent elaboration of symmetric structures like E8. Sophus Liea Norwegian mathematician believe that a series of symmetric groupsgifted of continuous transformations (few or many changes, after rotating a sphere to any distance around its axis, for example), without at the end be produced an apparent change in the object. One of such structures of perfect symmetry is the E8 that describes the simmetry of a 57-dimensional object capableto be rotated in 248 forms without changes in its appearance. Its elaboration demanded 4 years, 77 hours and the analisis of 200 trillion entrances. Physics and mathematicians agree in that this structure correctly interpreted will help to understand the origin of our universe, the structure of atoms, certain particularities of the quantum physics and relativity, enabling the creation of a unified physics (integrating to the gravity), says Jeffrey D. Adams, professor of mathematics from the the University of Maryland chief of the project. Acording to Robert L. Bryant, in the meantime the multidimensional E8, will give support to the theory of superstrings
Simetria y Big Bang.
Una adecuada comprensión de la simetría fisica, es fundamental para comprender el origen del universo y nuestra presencia orgánica, constituida básicamente por protones y neutrones. Hasta 1956 se asumia que las leyes de la fisica poseian 3 simetrias independientes : C, P y T (simetría C =leyes fisicas, iguales para particulas y antipartículas. Sim. P=leyes fisicas iguales para una situación cualquiera y su imagen especular. Sim. T=si se invierte la direccion del movimiento (tiempo), de particulas y antiparticulas el sistema vuelve a ser igual). Hoy no se aceptan simetrías independientes sino la accion combinada :CPT, existiendo un teorema según el cual el universo tendria que comportarse igual si se reemplazaran sus particulas por antiparticulas, se adoptara su imagen especular y se invirtiera la dirección del tiempo: J.W.Cronin y Val Fitch, Tsung Dao Lee y Chen Ning Yan). Pocos nanosegundos después del Big Bang existian supuestamente cantidades iguales de quarks y antiquarks. Entonces, nuestra presencia aquí solo se entiende en el supuesto de que a poco de ocurrido el Big Bang, predominaron por alguna razón mas quarks que antiquarks, constituyendo la materia organica de que estamos hecho.
Al logro de una mejor comprensión de lo anterior ayudará la reciente elaboración de estructuras simétricas (E8). Sophus Lie un matemático noruego creó una serie de grupos simétricos dotados de transformaciones continuas (pocos o muchos cambios, tras rotar una esfera a cualquier distancia alrededor de su eje, por ejemplo), sin que se produzca al final un cambio aparente en el objeto. Uno de tales estructuras de simetría perfecta es el E8 que describe la simetria de un objeto de 57 dimensiones, capáz de ser rotado en 248 formas sin cambios en su apariencia. Su elaboración ha demandado 4 años, 77 horas y el análisis de 200 billones de entradas. Fisicos y maematicos concuerdan en que esta estructura correctamente interpretada ayudará a comprender el origen de nuestro universo, la estructura intima de los atomos, ciertas particularidades de la fisica cuántica y la relatividad, posibilitando la creación de una fisica unificada (integrando a la gravedad), dice Jeffrey D. Adams, professor de mathematicas del la Universidad de Maryland jefe del proyecto. Segun Robert L. Bryant, en tanto multidimensional, el E8, ayudará a desentrañar la teoria de las supercuerdas.